← Insights

Why good org design still fails: the run, serve, change model explained

Eloise Seidelin
July 28, 2026
•
3 mins
Illustration of three people passing a baton in a relay, with the text 'Stefan Norrvall's change model: Run, Serve, Change'

You've done the org design. New structure, new role descriptions, the lot. So why isn't it working?

Stefan Norrvall has a theory, and it starts with a simple observation: every organisation does three completely different kinds of work at the same time, and we keep treating them as one thing called "work". He joined me on the Change It Podcast to explain his run, serve, change model.

What are run, serve and change?

  • Run: the operational work that keeps the lights on and delivers today's promises to customers.
  • Serve: coordinating and integrating work across teams, because most organisations have more than one product or service.
  • Change: changing the organisation itself, including sensing the outside environment and adapting to it.

Each carries a different kind of complexity and works at a different pace. Treat them as "just work" and things start to break.

Why it matters

Stefan describes a coherent organisation as one where decisions are made at the right level, by roles with both accountability and authority, and where acting on that authority doesn't need pre-alignment, sponsorship or special courage.

When that breaks down, you pay what Stefan calls the confusion tax. We unpack it in our blog: 'Why people resist change'.

Build change into the work

Stefan's model repeats at every level. Run has its own serve and its own change. Teams should be able to change how they work within boundaries set at the enterprise level. They can't, for example, decide to enter a new market alone. It's a bit like teaching people to fish, not doing the fishing for them.

Built this way, change isn't a bolt-on. He says organisations that are really good at change rarely talk about change management, because it's part of how they work. Most programmes do the work first and then try to convince everyone it's good for them, which he says is too late.

Four things to try

  1. Name the three types of work. Ask where run, serve and change are being treated as one.
  2. Let run change itself. Give teams the authority to change how they work within clear boundaries, and be clear about what only the enterprise level can decide.
  3. Protect your serve functions. Centres of excellence are serve work. When they do it well, problems don't happen, so their value is easy to miss. Stefan compares it to dismantling the fire department because there are no fires. Executive tenure is often only two to four years, so the function gets removed, missed, then rebuilt at a higher cost.
  4. Follow See, Shape, Grow. See how the system really works today. Shape the critical interventions. Grow leadership capability so you don't rely on outside support.

Listen and next steps

Share this post

Related posts

Skier in a red jacket mid-jump in the snow, with the text 'Pro-ski? Prosigh? Do you really need it?'
Change Management

Pro-sigh or Pro-ski? Is Prosci worth it for change managers?

Is Prosci worth it? Two hiring managers share how much weight they give the certification, what it teaches and what it can't replace.

Woman covering her mouth in front of a chalkboard covered in the word 'just', with the text 'Stop saying just: words that give your power away, with Nan Gesche'
Careers in Change

The words that give your power away (and what to say instead)

The small words that quietly give your power away at work, and what to say instead. Nan Gesche on the double bind, being yourself and negotiating language.

Nan Gesche smiling, with the text 'Ask for more $$$: how to negotiate your salary'
Salary & Market Insights

How to negotiate your salary or rate: the skill nobody teaches you

Nobody teaches us to negotiate. Nan Gesche's simple framework for preparing, holding the conversation and following up when you ask for more.